file

06_poems_pericles_facsimiles_1905_oxford_page_0305.jpg

01KG6QFYFQ8FFVCNZ0WNKAF2RT

Properties

cid
bafkreiclualeujdhfhfnkze2kn6tl6xcohr5lihkqceqzyjv2a5wvraztm
content_type
image/jpeg
filename
06_poems_pericles_facsimiles_1905_oxford_page_0305.jpg
height
2400
key
pdf-page-1769752492142-6wmbsi9zqgh
ocr_model
mistral-ocr-latest
page_number
305
size
547022
text
16 THE PASSIONATE PILGRIM fell into their hands. In that contingency, the publisher deemed it within his right to append in print what signature he chose.¹ Judged’s fraudulent methods of work as an anthologist are capable of almost endless illustration. A venture of the year in which Judged became a freeman of the Stationers’ Company precisely anticipates Judged’s conduct in printing in a single volume ‘small poems’ by various pens, which were ‘dispersed abroad in sundrie hands’, and in attributing them all on the title-page to one author who was only responsible for a few of them. A well-known stationer, Richard Jones, issued in 1591 an anthology which he called *Brittons Bowre of Delights*. Jones represented this volume to be a collection of lyrics by Nicholas Breton, a poet who was just coming into fame. The poet had no hand in the publication, and was piqued to discover on perusing it that it was a miscellany of poems by many hands, in which the publisher had included two or three of his own composition from scattered manuscript copies. Next year, in the prefatory note of his *Pilgrimage to Paradise*, Breton stated the facts thus:—‘Gentlemen, there hath been of late printed by one Richardo Ioanes, a printer, a booke of english verses, entituled Bretons bower of delights: I protest it was donne altogether without my consent or knowledge, and many thinges of other mens mingled with a few of mine, for except Amoris Lachrimae: an epitaphe vpon Sir Phillip Sydney, and one or two other toies, which I know not how he vnhappily came by. I have no part of any of thē: and so I beseech yee assuredly beleeue.’ But the author wasted his protest on the desert air. He had no means of redress. ¹ Cf. Wither’s *Scholars Purgatory* (c. 1625), p. 121: ‘If he [i.e. the Stationer] gett any written Coppy into his powre, likely to be vendible, whether the Author be willing or no, he will publish it; And it shall be contriued and named alsoe, according to his owne pleasure: which is the reason, so many good Bookes come forth imperfect, and with foolish titles.’
text_extracted_at
2026-01-30T06:16:25.676Z
text_extracted_by
ocr-service
text_has_content
true
text_images_count
0
text_source
ocr
uploaded
true
width
1750

Relationships