file

06_poems_pericles_facsimiles_1905_oxford_page_0303.jpg

01KG6QFYPE2M3WAENKTMK2WR6G

Properties

cid
bafkreigosgaz6qrq6llhbvbmuuzvxwjil2kr37bi5qvasqlvy3qher6e5y
content_type
image/jpeg
filename
06_poems_pericles_facsimiles_1905_oxford_page_0303.jpg
height
2400
key
pdf-page-1769752492140-5yd2kencvej
ocr_model
mistral-ocr-latest
page_number
303
size
503291
text
14 THE PASSIONATE PILGRIM Typographical defects and characteristics. miscellany is not high. Misprints abound. Numerous lines are as they stand barely intelligible. Such defects were mainly due to imperfections in the ‘copy’, but they bear witness, too, to hasty composition and to carelessness on the part of the press corrector. Few of the irregularities are beyond the ingenuity of a conscientious overseer to remove. In Poem IX, the second line of the sonnet is omitted. There is only one catchword in the whole volume, viz. ‘Lord’, at the foot of B 8 (recto). Capitals within the line are not very common, but are employed most capriciously. In Sonnet IV, three of the fourteen lines begin with small letters instead of capitals. At V, l. 7, ‘eases’ rimes with ‘there’. Spelling eccentricities which are scarcely to be differentiated from misprints, include —II, l. 12, ‘ghesse’ for ‘guess’; V, l. 1, ‘deawy’ for ‘dewy’; XIII, l. 10, ‘symant’ for ‘cement’; XIV, l. 15, ‘scite’ for ‘cite’; ‘scence’ for ‘sense’ (the word ‘sense’ is correctly spelt VIII, l. 6); l. 19, ‘ditte’ for ‘ditty’; XVII, l. 4, ‘nenying’ for ‘renying’; l. 8, ‘a nay’ for ‘annoy’; l. 12, ‘wowen for ‘women’; XVIII, l. 34, ‘prease’ for ‘press’; l. 51, ‘th’ are’ for ‘the ear’. The volume was a small octavo and the meagre dimensions of the ‘copy’ led the printer to set the type on only one side of the leaf in the case of twenty-five of the twenty-eight leaves of text. At the top and bottom of each page of text is an ornamental device of ordinary pattern—no uncommon feature in small volumes of verse of the period. II Jaggard’s precedents The part that Jaggard played throughout the enterprise followed abundant precedents. It was common practice for publishers to issue, under a general title of their own devising, scattered pieces of poetry of varied origin. His brother’s master, Tottel, had inaugurated the custom in 1557,
text_extracted_at
2026-01-30T06:16:24.167Z
text_extracted_by
ocr-service
text_has_content
true
text_images_count
0
text_source
ocr
uploaded
true
width
1750

Relationships