subsection

Heywood’s Rape of Lucrece.

01KG6S6KP0FH4YFWS830MFRHH2

Properties

description
# Heywood’s Rape of Lucrece. ## Overview This subsection, titled "Heywood’s Rape of Lucrece.", is part of Section III of a larger work. It was extracted from the file `pdf-01KG6Q7Q25RHMFT3SJXPV18VFF.txt` and belongs to the collection "PDF Workflow Main Test 2026-01-30T00:26:53". The text discusses Shakespeare's name appearing on an outer leaf, along with titles of his plays, and a crude excerpt from "Lucrece". It also touches upon arguments regarding Bacon's potential authorship of Shakespeare's works, referencing recent reprints of the manuscript by T. Le Marchant Douse and Thomas Burgoyne. ## Context This subsection is situated within Section III, which is part of a larger chapter. The content appears in the context of a discussion about plagiarism and literary influences, as indicated by its preceding subsection, "Plagiarisms.", and its succeeding subsection, "Duckling's 'Supplement.'". The text is derived from a file that is part of a collection named "PDF Workflow Main Test 2026-01-30T00:26:53". ## Contents The subsection contains a brief excerpt from Shakespeare's "Lucrece," noting a scribbled quote: "reuealing day through euery Crany peepes and see." It dismisses arguments that this scribble indicates Bacon's authorship of Shakespeare's works. The text also mentions that the manuscript has been reprinted by T. Le Marchant Douse and Thomas Burgoyne, highlighting their differing interpretations of the manuscript's significance.
description_generated_at
2026-01-30T06:25:50.320Z
description_model
gemini-2.5-flash-lite
description_title
Heywood’s Rape of Lucrece.
end_line
3518
extracted_at
2026-01-30T06:24:43.553Z
extracted_by
structure-extraction-lambda
start_line
3513
text
Heywood’s Rape of Lucrece. ¹ Shakespeare’s name is repeated many times, in various forms, on this outside leaf, together with the titles of two of his plays, Rychard the Second and Rychard the Third. The crude excerpt from Lucrece runs:—‘reuealing day through euery Crany peepes and see.’ The careless scribble has little significance, and was possibly the work of a scribe testing a new pen. No attention need be paid to the arguments which would treat the manuscript rigmarole as evidence of Bacon’s responsibility for Shakespeare’s works. The MS. has been twice reprinted lately, by Mr. T. Le Marchant Douse, who takes a sensible view of the problem offered by the scribble, and by Mr. Thomas Burgoyne, who is inclined to take the incoherences seriously. <!-- [Page 164](arke:01KG6QCCZXF2T9BNE1TMNA17EC) --> LUCRECE 25
title
Heywood’s Rape of Lucrece.

Relationships