file

02_venus_and_adonis_1905_facsimile_page_0050.jpg

01KG8B0SZSF01XS402Z81VP7G5

Properties

cid
bafkreihcan452byqtl6ayuclwhcistacpxeuzateij2dvi623xxeffnm54
content_type
image/jpeg
filename
02_venus_and_adonis_1905_facsimile_page_0050.jpg
height
2400
key
pdf-page-1769806521478-1zw192qxg65
page_number
50
pdf_type
born_digital
size
547590
text
44 VENUS AND ADONIS had his second poem, Lucrecc^ ready for the press. Contrary to expectation, the copyright of the Lucrece was acquired on June 9, not by Field, but by Harrison. The arrange- ment, whatever its cause, was a perfectly friendly one \ Field accepted a commission from Harrison to print in 15-94 the original edition of Lucrece^ of which Harrison had just acquired the copyright, as well as a third edition in I f 9(5 of Venus and Jdonis^ the copyright of which Harrison had bought from Field two years previously. In the latter case the imprint ran :— ' Imprinted at London by R. F. for lohn Harison.' That issue of 1 5-9(5 brought to a close the association alike of Field and Harrison with the publishing of Shakespeare's writings. The three earliest editions of Venus and Adonis and the first edition of Lucrece came from the press of the poet's fellow townsman, and there the connexion of his press with Shakespeare's work ended. Field's The title-pages of the four issues of Shakespeare's poems which Field printed are all distinguished by a large printer's device, which Field had borrowed of his master Vautrollier. It consists of a suspended anchor, of which the ring is grasped by a right hand issuing from clouds. Two leafy boughs cross each other about the anchor, and the whole is enclosed in a heavily scrolled and ornamented frame of oval shape, within the top of which hang capital letters forming the motto Anchora Spei. Vautrollier possessed at least four forms of this device, and Field seems to have employed as many. Those appearing on the title-pages of the Venus and Adonis of 15-93 ^^^ If 94 ^r^ from one plate; that on the Lucrece of 1 5-94 is from another of somewhat different design. Both are of good workmanship. The discrepancies, although slight, are well marked ; the chief is that the intertwined boughs cross each other behind the shaft of the anchor in the first two device.
text_extracted_at
2026-01-30T20:55:21.478Z
text_extracted_by
pdf-processor
text_has_content
true
text_source
born_digital
uploaded
true
width
1632

Relationships