file

02_venus_and_adonis_1905_facsimile_page_0166.jpg

01KG8B587CGACB6T4801D7KJ7N

Properties

cid
bafkreieei7cl6cnknk7ijkbahw2tat25ujktfksndwmgi23q4fe2ilsabi
content_type
image/jpeg
filename
02_venus_and_adonis_1905_facsimile_page_0166.jpg
height
2400
key
pdf-page-1769806643974-dnvcko3yur7
page_number
166
pdf_type
born_digital
size
530812
text
30 LUCRECE The text and typography of the first edition. Discrepan- cies among extant exemplars. The Bod- leian copy, I. Unique readings. V Harrison and Field's first edition of 1 5-94 is the sole authentic source of the text of the poem. That alone followed the author's manuscript. The later editions were set up from those that went before. Small typographical changes were introduced into the reissues, but all the alterations may be put to the credit of correctors of the press acting on their own responsibility, excepting possibly in the case of the edition of 16 16 J which came out soon after Shakespeare's death. In that volume there are traces of a clumsy editorial revision. It is improbable that the author supervised the production of the first edition, but greater care was taken in its typography than in the case of any other of Shakespeare's works, — not excepting IJenus and Adonis. The work is not free from misprints nor from other typographical irregularities. But an effort was made to reduce their number to the lowest possible limit. The original edition was printed off slowly j the type was kept standing after the first impressions left the office, and small changes were subsequently introduced into the standing- type, with the result that the itw surviving copies of the first edition show small discrepancies among themselves. One impression is freer from typographical errors than another, or a correction which has been made in one copy, with a view to improving the sense or the grammar, is absent from another copy. The alterations are not always intelligent, and it is unlikely that Shakespeare had any hand in them. The copy in the Bodleian Library which is reproduced in this volume — one of two in that library — has at least five readings which are met with nowhere else. They were appar- ently all deemed to be defects, and were afterwards changed.
text_extracted_at
2026-01-30T20:57:23.974Z
text_extracted_by
pdf-processor
text_has_content
true
text_source
born_digital
uploaded
true
width
1632

Relationships